THE HEALING OF THE Gerasene man who was demonized by a “legion” of demons (Mark 5:1–20) calls for explanations and reflection at many points. To pick up on six:
(1) The setting is Gentile territory on the east side of Lake Galilee, in the region of the Decapolis (Mark 5:20),
the Ten Cities of largely Gentile constitution. That point is clear
even from the herd of pigs, something that no self-respecting Jew would
keep.
(2) The poor man described in these verses was subject to some sort
of cyclical attack. At times he was docile enough to be chained, and
then the attack would be so desperately strong that he could tear the
chains apart and free himself. Banished from home and hearth, he lived
among the tombs, where he cried out and lacerated himself, a man in the
final throes of destruction by demonic powers (Mark 5:5).
We should not assume that every case of what is today called insanity
is the result of demonic activity; neither should we adopt the
reductionism that reduces all demonism to chemical imbalances in the
brain.
(3) The words addressed to Jesus (Mark 5:6–8),
though on the lips of the man, are the product of the “evil spirit.”
This spirit knows enough (a) to recognize who Jesus is, and (b) to live
in horrible anticipation of the ultimate doom that awaits him.
(4) This exchange between Jesus and the “evil spirit” has two
elements not found in any other exorcism in the canonical Gospels. First,
the strange interplay between the singular and plural—“My name is
Legion, … for we are many”—suggests an ambiguity in certain demonic
activity. Moreover, as Jesus hints elsewhere, multiple invasion by
unclean spirits is a “worse” condition to be scrupulously avoided (Matt. 12:45). Second, these demons do not wish to leave the area, and they do wish to be embodied (Mark 5:10, 12).
Jesus accedes to both requests. Presumably this reflects in part the
fact that the final hour for their banishment has not yet arrived.
(5) While it is essential to reflect on Jesus’ absolute mastery over
these evil spirits, one must add that he does not call forth these
spirits one by one, solicit their names, enter into conversation with
them, or a host of other things commonly practiced by some who are given
to “deliverance ministries.”
(6) The responses to this deliverance are striking. The delivered man
wants to follow Jesus, and is commissioned to bear witness, in his
Gentile world, to how much the Lord has done for him and how he has
shown him mercy (Mark 5:18–20). The people of the region beg Jesus to leave (Mark 5:17): they prefer pigs to people, their financial security to the transformation of a life.
Don Carson
I am a blues guitar player and a follower of Jesus. This blog is about music, especially Blues, theology, humor, culture and anything else that rolls through my brain. "The sky is crying, look at the tears roll down the street"
Showing posts with label D A Carson. Show all posts
Showing posts with label D A Carson. Show all posts
Monday, July 25, 2011
Thursday, March 24, 2011
What Does It Mean to Preach the Whole Counsel of God
“I did not shrink from declaring to you the whole counsel of God.”
—The Apostle Paul to the Ephesian elders, Acts 20:27
D. A. Carson explains what he meant:When Paul attests that this is what he proclaimed to the believers in Ephesus, the Ephesian elders to whom he makes this bold asseveration know full well that he had managed this remarkable feat in only two and a half years.—D. A. Carson, “Challenges for the Twenty-first-century Pulpit,” in Preach the Word: Essays on Expository Preaching: In Honor of R. Kent Hughes, ed. Leland Ryken and Todd Wilson [Crossway, 2007], pp. 177-178; bullets and italics added.
In other words, whatever else Paul did, he certainly did not manage to go through every verse of the Old Testament, line by line, with full-bore explanation. He simply did not have time.
What he must mean is that he taught the burden of the whole of God’s revelation, the balance of things, leaving nothing out that was of primary importance, never ducking the hard bits, helping believers to grasp the whole counsel of God that they themselves would become better equipped to read their Bibles intelligently, comprehensively.
It embraced
- God’s purposes in the history of redemption (truths to be believed and a God to be worshiped),
- an unpacking of human origin, fall, redemption, and destiny (a worldview that shapes all human understanding and a Savior without whom there is no hope),
- the conduct expected of God’s people (commandments to be obeyed and wisdom to be pursued, both in our individual existence and in the community of the people of God), and
- the pledges of transforming power both in this life and in the life to come (promises to be trusted and hope to be anticipated).
Justin Taylor
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)